Trinh @ Bath

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
vpde_lecture32 [2020/04/16 08:45]
trinh created
vpde_lecture32 [2020/04/16 12:34] (current)
trinh [Section 19.1: Uniqueness for zero Dirichlet heat equation]
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Lecture 33: Uniqueness of solutions I ====== ====== Lecture 33: Uniqueness of solutions I ======
 +
 +<html>
 +<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/L6gCUXMdqoQ" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 +</html>
 +
 +In this lecture, we'll prove uniqueness for two variants of the heat equation. The different variants you should consider as as follows (all posed on $x\in[0, L]$): 
 +$$
 +\begin{aligned}
 +u_t &= \kappa u_{xx}, \\
 +u(x, 0) &= 0,
 +\end{aligned}
 +$$
 +with either Dirichlet conditions [D]
 +$$
 +\begin{aligned}
 +u &= T_0 \quad (x = 0), \\
 +u(L, t) &= T_1\quad (x = L),
 +\end{aligned}
 +$$
 +or Neumann conditions [N]
 +$$
 +\begin{aligned}
 +u_x &= G_0 \quad (x = 0), \\
 +u_x &= G_1\quad (x = L),
 +\end{aligned}
 +$$
 +or mixed conditions [M]
 +$$
 +\begin{gathered}
 +A_0 u + B_0 u_x = H_0 \quad (x = 0), \\
 +A_1 u + B_1 u_x = H_1 \quad (x = L).
 +\end{gathered}
 +$$
  
 ===== Section 19.1: Uniqueness for zero Dirichlet heat equation  ===== ===== Section 19.1: Uniqueness for zero Dirichlet heat equation  =====
Line 36: Line 69:
 E'(t) = \kappa w w_x \biggr\rvert_0^L - \kappa \int_0^L w_x^2 \, \mathrm{d}x = - \kappa \int_0^L w_x^2 \, \mathrm{d}x E'(t) = \kappa w w_x \biggr\rvert_0^L - \kappa \int_0^L w_x^2 \, \mathrm{d}x = - \kappa \int_0^L w_x^2 \, \mathrm{d}x
 $$ $$
-where the second equality occurs because $w 0$ at $x = 0$ and $x = L$. So in the end, we have the fact that +where the second equality occurs because $w(0, t) = 0 = w(L, t)[*]. So in the end, we have the fact that 
 $$ $$
 E'(t) = - \kappa \int_0^L w_x^2 \, \mathrm{d}x \leq 0, E'(t) = - \kappa \int_0^L w_x^2 \, \mathrm{d}x \leq 0,
 $$ $$
-so the energy is always decreasing. But note that $E'(0) = 0$ since $w(x, 0) = 0$. Finally, note that $E(t)$ is always $\geq 0$ by its form (the integral of a squared quantity). So the energy is always decreasing, begins from zero, and can never be negative. Therefore+so the energy is always decreasing. But note that $E'(0) = 0$ since $w(x, 0) = 0$. Finally, note that $E(t)$ is always $\geq 0$ by its form (the integral of a squared quantity). So the energy is always decreasing, begins from zero, and can never be negative. We have the three statements: 
 +  - $E'(t) \leq 0$ for all time, 
 +  - $E(0) = 0$, 
 +  - $E(t) \geq 0$ for all time, 
 + 
 +and you would conclude that it has to remain at its initial value, and therefore
 $$ $$
 E(t) \equiv 0  E(t) \equiv 0 
 $$ $$
-for all time. +for all time. Looking at the form of the integrand, you would conclude that the only way this occurs is if the integrand is itself zero, or  
 +$$ 
 +w^2(x, t) = 0  
 +$$ 
 +for all $x\in[0, L]$ and for all $t \geq 0$. So $w = u - v \equiv 0$ and thus u(x, t) \equiv v(x, t)$ and the solutions must be the same.  
 + 
 +===== Section 19.2: Uniqueness for other BCs of the heat equation  ===== 
 + 
 +The proof of uniqueness for the Neumann condition [N] is done identically to the above, except in the step marked with [*] we use the fact that $w_x(0, t) = 0 = w_x(L, t)$. But you would arrive at the same conclusions as above.