Trinh @ Bath

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
aims_2023 [2023/11/03 13:33]
trinh
aims_2023 [2024/03/11 09:36] (current)
trinh
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Zoom instructions ======
 +
 +In order to have the best experience, we have a strong preference to host the seminars in person. However, for accessibility, we also open it to online audiences as well. Please if you plan to join online, it is often helpful to let the organiser know in advance---this means the speaker can be warned and/or we can ensure that all the tech is set up properly.
 +
 +Join Zoom Meeting
 +https://bath-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/94397983249?pwd=QllOQUw3U3JzRGdiWE82TS9WRGQ1Zz09
 +
 +<code>
 +Meeting ID: 943 9798 3249
 +Passcode: 264978
 +
 +Find your local number: https://bath-ac-uk.zoom.us/u/acMPWc7uN2
 +</code>
 +
 +
 ====== 2023-24 ====== ====== 2023-24 ======
  
Line 51: Line 66:
 Hydrology, amongst other environmental sciences, is fraught with uncertainties. I will borrow a monster metaphor to explore these uncertainties in hydrology, and how our practical responses to them can sometimes lead to pathological coping strategies. I will argue that the uncertainty monster manifests in practical hydrology through a proliferation of model formulations, which cannot always be conclusively accepted or rejected, or distinguished from each other given the limitations of our observed data. We might stand a better chance of coping with the monster if we could test and compare our models in ways that expose their fundamental traits, and can be compared with theoretically-motivated benchmarks. Hydrology, amongst other environmental sciences, is fraught with uncertainties. I will borrow a monster metaphor to explore these uncertainties in hydrology, and how our practical responses to them can sometimes lead to pathological coping strategies. I will argue that the uncertainty monster manifests in practical hydrology through a proliferation of model formulations, which cannot always be conclusively accepted or rejected, or distinguished from each other given the limitations of our observed data. We might stand a better chance of coping with the monster if we could test and compare our models in ways that expose their fundamental traits, and can be compared with theoretically-motivated benchmarks.
  
-===== Zoom instructions =====+===== Matthew Juniper =====
  
-In order to have the best experiencewe have a strong preference to host the seminars in person. Howeverfor accessibility, we also open it to online audiences as wellPlease if you plan to join online, it is often helpful to let the organiser (Philknow in advance---this means the speaker can be warned and/or we can ensure that all the tech is set up properly.+**Date:** Tuesday 14 Nov 2023 1:15pm \\ 
 +**From:** University of CambridgeEnergyFluids and Turbomachinery \\ 
 +**Location:** 4 West 1.(Wolfson Room\\ 
 +**Title:** Adjoint-accelerated Bayesian Inference
  
-Join Zoom Meeting +{{ :aims:23_juniper.png?nolink&300|}}
-https://bath-ac-uk.zoom.us/j/98613925892?pwd=TURvbHlka2JpTzhoYXpraU5TdVBSZz09+
  
-Further details+"Bayesian Inference provides a probabilistic framework that is well suited to Machine Learning of model parameters from data. We specify any number of candidate models, their parameters, and their prior probability distributions. When data arrives, we calculate (i) the most likely parameter values, (ii) their posterior probability distributions, (iii) the marginal likelihood of each model. This combines how well each model fits the data with how much each parameter space collapses when the data arrive. This penalizes (i) models that do not fit the data and (ii) models that fit the data but whose parameters require excessively delicate tuning to do so. 
  
-<code> +Bayesian inference is usually prohibitively expensive, but its cost is greatly reduced if all distributions are taken to be Gaussian. This is often reasonable and can always be checked a posteriori. This allows the optimal parameter values to be found cheaply with gradient-based optimization and their posterior uncertainties, and marginal likelihoods to be calculated instantly with Laplace's method. This requires calculation of the gradients of each model's outputs with respect to its parameters, which is achieved cheaply with adjoint methods at first and (optionally) second order. 
-Meeting ID: 986 1392 5892 +
-Passcode: 052599+
  
----+I will outline Bayesian inference, Laplace's method, the acceleration due to adjoint methods, and Bayesian experimental design. I will demonstrate this with assimilation of 3D Flow-MRI data, model selection in thermoacoustics, and Bayesian identification of nonlinear dynamics."
  
-One tap mobile +===== Corwin Wright  =====
-+442034815237,,98613925892#,,,,*052599# United Kingdom +
-+442034815240,,98613925892#,,,,*052599# United Kingdom+
  
----+**Date:** Tuesday 28 Nov 2023 1:15pm \\ 
 +**From:** University of Bath, Electronic and Electrical Engineering \\ 
 +**Location:** 4 West 1.7 (Wolfson Room) \\ 
 +**Title:** How well do global km-scale models simulate convective atmospheric waves?
  
-Dial by your location +"Atmospheric gravity waves are critical to the atmospheric circulation, and play key roles in atmospheric chemistry and dynamics. Due to their small scales (10s to 100s of kilometres in the horizontal, up to the low 10s of kilometres in the vertical), their effects are usually computationally approximated in even current weather models. However, new kilometre-scale models of the kind made possible with modern supercomputing should accurately simulate these waves.
-• +44 203 481 5237 United Kingdom +
-• +44 203 481 5240 United Kingdom +
-• +44 203 901 7895 United Kingdom +
-• +44 208 080 6591 United Kingdom +
-• +44 208 080 6592 United Kingdom +
-• +44 330 088 5830 United Kingdom +
-• +44 131 460 1196 United Kingdom+
  
-Meeting ID986 1392 5892 +To assess this, we ideally want to compare the model output to observations. However, observations are critically limited by the 'observational filter' problem, whereby an instrument's ability to resolve gravity waves is a function not just of resolution but also sampling pattern. Thus, we cannot just assess the waves separately in the models and the observations and then compare the results. 
-Passcode052599+ 
 +Here, I present preliminary results from a international team project to assess how well these models perform relative to observations, using high resolution runs from the DYAMOND multimodel comparison and careful model-sampling techniques to address the observational filter problem. All runs both resolve the stratosphere and simulate scales where the waves visible to our observations should be resolved. This allows us produce datasets which can be compared one-to-one. I show some preliminary results from these comparisons, and discuss the implications of the differences seen for weather forecast model development." 
 + 
 +===== Jesse Taylor-West  ===== 
 + 
 +**Date:** Tuesday 5 Dec 2023 1:15pm \\ 
 +**From:** University of Bristol \\ 
 +**Location:** 4 West 1.7 (Wolfson Room) \\ 
 +**Title:** Corner flows of viscoplastic fluids  
 + 
 +"Many environmental and industrial fluids are viscoplastic; behaving like a solid at low stresses but flowing like a fluid at stresses above a threshold yield stress. The presence of a yield stress can often result in significant departures from Newtonian behaviour, exhibiting ‘plugged’ regions of unyielded fluid and the development of viscoplastic boundary layers (thin regions of highly sheared fluid) when the yield stress is large. Due to the non-linearity of the relationship between stress and strain rate, viscoplastic fluids pose a mathematical and computational challenge to study, often precluding the existence of exact analytical solutions and the application of standard computational techniques. 
 + 
 +In this talk I will present solutions for flows of idealised viscoplastic fluids in corners and wedges, using matched-asymptotic methods and numerics to demonstrate how the yield stress modulates the corresponding classical Newtonian similarity solutions. These flow configurations have application to transport and processing of viscoplastic fluids, and the quasi-analytical nature of the solutions can provide new bench-marks for computational codes." 
 + 
 +===== Chris Budd ===== 
 + 
 +**Date:** Tuesday 12 Dec 2023 1:15pm \\ 
 +**From:** University of Bath, Mathematical Sciences \\ 
 +**Location:** 4 West 1.7 (Wolfson Room) \\ 
 +**Title:** Machine learning and PINNs 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +===== Jonathan Cox ===== 
 + 
 +**Date:** Tuesday 9 Jan 2023 1:15pm \\ 
 +**From:** University of Bath, Department of Chemistry \\ 
 +**Location:** 4 West 1.7 (Wolfson Room) \\ 
 +**Title:** Scent capture in a hagfish 
 + 
 +In this seminar I will explain what scent capture means, what a hagfish is, why this particular hagfish is special to the University, and why studying scent capture in a hagfish is important. I will then say what we have learnt from our study, and how this knowledge can be applied to scent-tracking robots, electronic noses, and microfluidic devices (the hagfish nose is really just a very ancient microfluidic device, pre-dating all the microfluidic lab-on-a-chip hoo-ha by about 300 million years). 
 + 
 +The talk should appeal to anyone interested in biological flow, biology, and sensors. It will involve computational fluid dynamics (determining the pattern of flow in the hagfish nose) and numerical modelling (of scent capture), as well as some dye visualisation (to validate the computational fluid dynamics). Dogs and humans will make a brief appearance. 
 + 
 +===== Raphael Stuhlmeier ===== 
 + 
 +**Date:** Tuesday 27 Feb 2023 1:15pm \\ 
 +**From:** University of Plymouth \\ 
 +**Location:** 4 West 1.7 (Wolfson Room) \\ 
 +**Title:** Deterministic wave forecasting with nonlinear dispersion corrections 
 + 
 +Deterministic wave forecasting aims to provide a wave-by-wave prediction of the free surface elevation based on measured data. Such information about upcoming waves can inform marine decision support systems, control strategies for wave energy converters, and other applications. Unlike well-developed stochastic wave forecasts, the temporal and spatial scales involved are modest, on the order of minutes or kilometres. Due to the dispersive nature of surface water waves, such forecasts have a limited space/time horizon, which is further impacted by the effects of nonlinearity. I will discuss the application of the reduced Zakharov equation, and simple frequency corrections derived therefrom, to preparing wave forecasts. Unlike procedures based on solving evolution equations (e.g. high order spectral method), such corrections entail essentially no additional computational effort, yet show marked improvements over linear theory. 
 +  
 +===== Eamonn Gaffney ===== 
 + 
 +**Date:** Tuesday 12 Mar 2023 1:15pm \\ 
 +**From:** Wolfson Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford.  \\ 
 +**Location:** 4 West 1.7 (Wolfson Room) \\ 
 +**Title:** Aspects of spatial mathematical and computational modelling in developmental biology and immuno-oncology 
 + 
 +We illustrate the versatility of spatial mathematical and computational modelling in the life sciences by first considering features of the diffusively-driven Turing instability that are relevant in developmental biology. In particular, we initially focus on a mathematical consideration of the conditions for the Turing instability in the presence of an underlying spatial heterogeneity. We then consider an application of Turing’s idea in exploring the hypothesis that the mechanism driving finger-print formation features an abrogated  hair follicle pattern formation mechanism. Then, with the theme of versatility, we consider how representing cellular motility within the draining lymph nodes of a vaccination site can inform our interpretation and understanding of clinical trial results for short peptide cancer vaccines.  
  
-Find your local number: https://bath-ac-uk.zoom.us/u/amDPwav9 
-</code>